Separate names with a comma.
95% efficient?? Most speakers are only between 1-3% efficient...thats food for thought
There is always a point of diminishing returns
I know what your saying G3...I'm just giving you a hard time
not really easier to get more port area...just easier to design and build rather than buying and constructing all of the bends for a round port.
different basket...more venting Sexy as fvck dustcap though. I may get two of the e5s
a little late electro?? I see you are trying to raise your post count...I may have to change those numbers...seems like you are post whoring....
the crossfire would be louder...over double the cone area. The JLs would sound a lot better though...I'd take the JLs though...if they are in...
13Kv.2s are discontinued
a port is a port...volume is taken up. I don't know what you are talking about. A speaker does not "know" if the port is round, rectangular,...
subwoofers arent made to play over 100-120Hz anyways...its call inductance. Also never look at the frequency range...it is fully enclosure...
more port area means a higher peak...the port is basically a resonating air mass...the more there is the more air is excited.
its not accurate enough for me...it works though.
one 6" port is enough...also have you ever really heard a 25Hz sine wave??? I doubt that caddy was playing it with force
not accurate...its alright for noobs
RE Audio Calc sucks
Equipment is irrelevant right now...what are your goals with the system.
I'd rate it a 2/10
yeah i don't understand this either
weak as amp to be dimming lights
I saw that thread last year...hes a retard.
