First time poster/lurker with LOTS of Q&A

Discussion in 'Subwoofer Box and Custom Fabrication' started by i_am_cool_fred, Sep 9, 2011.

  1. i_am_cool_fred

    i_am_cool_fred New Member

    Hello all, This site is so mind boggling for me, i love great sound, i love deep bass, nice highs, mids are very good too. i have lots of questions and will probably develop more as i go along.

    as most that probably ask these questions, i'm on a ramen noodle and water budget.

    I have laying around the house, two blue cone Kenwood excelon(i think) tornado 10's, i also have two 12" insigina's (which i finally found the specs on last night)

    I have a (recently aquired) 2008 Dodge Nitro. I love it, but i'm a handy man, i love doing things to my cars, usually i'd focus this energy on my 58 volkswagen bus, but currently, i'm focusing my energy and fundage on my new love. so now that the immediate background info has been stated here's where the important info falls in and the real questions start.

    I plan on using one of the kenwood 10's, they sounded great in my 97 ford ranger(regular cab) so i know that one would give me some punchy bass in the nitro. I also plan on using my precision power 200 amp with external bass control. (it's kinda old school, but damn what an amp). The box i'm building has about 1.17cu/ft. of space (from what i remember, my measurements aren't in front of me at this moment, it may be 1.18).

    SO: in lurking on this sight i see some folks have suggested using WinISD to set up a box parameters to see how it performs. so i did that, plugged in the speaker (what i think is the speaker the selection is kinda odd to read through) did my cu/ft of space, put in how many watts (200 for max performance, probably a bit overkill) and get this graph:

    [​IMG]

    WHAT DOES IT MEAN????

    when going to this site http://www.polkaudio.com/caraudio/subbox/interpreting_data.php and read and it says in regards to the below graph:

    [​IMG]
    So, why does my graph go opposite of this??
    did i just plug something in wrong??

    As far as what i'm going after, i don't want ear bleeding, hear me for miles bass, i want "make my music crisp clean, hear the bass drums and bass guitar solo's beautifully and clear" bass

    I will be maintaining the stock head unit for now and will be buying one of these to make connections easier.

    it seems as though no matter what i put in for parameters, such as watts, i get no change on the graph, the only thing i see that changes is the lower end (on the left) goes up a tad if i make the box bigger. i was wanting a slot vent originally, but i don't think i have the room for that in my box, and it seems from what i've read it makes a bit more than i'm looking for

    opinions on that??
    do i have room in my box for a slot vent??
    how would that change my setup??
    how would i know how long/deep to make the vent??

    I've built boxes before, but it was in my old ford ranger, i was young, and didn't care i wanted something "cool" now i'm after something beneficial, tasteful, and somewhat hidden.

    Thanks for reading through my first EVER post on here, please help me with my questions the best way you know how. one thing to alert you on, i can give information needed for the sub based on what i've found on crutchfield, but i cannot give much info on the amp, i bought it second hand from a friend who had it back in the day, all i know is it's performed better than any other amp i've put in and it's the smallest one i've ever put in.
     
  2. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    Your box will be fine, and if you want a little more low end bass, then port it. You can use a piece of 3-inch PVC for your port. It will need to be between 11 and 12-inches long. The port will also need to be on the baffle board (the same board the speaker is mounted to).

    If you want to see the difference in performance then just graph the same box with a 3-inch port, tuned to around 38 Hz. You can have both graphs up at the same time, just click on "New" and then make the new box. You can change the color of the different graphs by going to plot (I think it was plot). But you will see a big difference in performance.

    If you have a little more room, then a slightly larger box with a slot port might be the way to go.
     
  3. i_am_cool_fred

    i_am_cool_fred New Member

    Would the port HAVE to be on the baffle board?? Can I do a 90degree fitting to gain length on the port??
     
  4. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    The port needs to be on the baffle and yes, you can do a 90-degree turn.

    If you have room for a slightly larger box you could try this

    Kenwood Box.jpg

    This box is 11.5-inches tall by 19.5-inches wide by 15.5inches deep. The port is 1.25-inches wide by 10-inches tall. Its 17.25-inches long.

    Something to consider
     
  5. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    Kenwood Graphs.jpg

    The yellow line is the same graph as yours. The green line is your box ported and tuned to 36 Hz. The light blue line is my box tuned to 38Hz. Notice that the relative gain is slightly higher in my box and it plays just slightly lower all the way to the -3dB point.

    The performance for both ported boxes is really close, let us know how it goes
     
  6. i_am_cool_fred

    i_am_cool_fred New Member

    So, in comparison to the three lines, the original box line takes longer to get where it needs to be, so in designing boxes, i want a quicker response than what my original one was. cool...i'll have to try the ported box.

    the catch currently on the room in the nitro is there is a cubby on the passenger rear area that would be perfect for a box, i could i guess add to the over all width (looking at the baffle board) but i don't think it'd be enough to mess with because it starts really getting into the fender well in that area.
     
  7. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    The sealed box is smoother, but the reality is that we want a little more bass. So the ported box works better. The graph shows a flat response so a tuning of 36Hz is perfect for that box and woofer combo. If I were building that box for myself, I would tune slightly higher for a little more relative gain. For me 38Hz would be the way to go which means a port length of 10-inches.

    I understand room is important for you, so your box is the minumum size (1.17 to 1.25 cu ft) I would recommend. If can get a little more room, do it. Size is the most important factor in a ported box. Stay with the 3-inch round port, it takes up very little space in the box.

    Build it, have fun
     
  8. kcox669live

    kcox669live Full Member

    tuning frequencies.jpg
    now i am confused. these are the curves i'm getting.
     
  9. kcox669live

    kcox669live Full Member

    well that didn't work. green is 24.96 hz, yellow is 29 hz and red is 37 hz. why do mine have so much gain and fall off so much sooner than yours at higher frequencies?
     
  10. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    I'm not sure what your asking, so I'll give you some general info about what your looking at and what your looking for. But first lets get something out of the way. There is no reason to tune to 25Hz. Many people believe that tuning to 25Hz means that it can play 25Hz. These people have no clue and are typically backyard audio amatuers, that do not have a basic understanding of speakers and enclosures and how they interact.

    Now lets look at my graph, its bigger and I can see it.

    JBL Graph.jpg

    First, if we want perfect sound, we want to stay on the 0dB (red) line. But realistically, we want more bass, we want more gain but for now lets look at what we got.

    The green line is a JBL woofer tuned to 25Hz. Notice that its starting to roll off before it even reaches 100Hz. Its at the -3dB point by 55Hz. And anything below that -3dB point we can forget about.

    Again, for best response we hant to stay on the 0dB line or slightly above it for best sound

    Now lets look at the same JBL tune to 40 Hz. Its performance is exceptional at 50Hz and up, in fact its much, much better than the same woofer tune to 25Hz. It doesnt hit the -3dB point until around 40Hz. So lets see, its tune 15Hz higher and it plays 15Hz lower.

    This is true of almost all woofers, even though it may not be this extreme.

    Remember, Again anything below the -3dB point doesnt matter.
     
  11. kcox669live

    kcox669live Full Member

    sorry my screen capture didn't work out so well. i'll get my son to show me how before i try it again:p. i understand exactly what you're saying. i'm using winISD. a flat response is exactly what i'm looking for, we are on the same page. all of the tf you posted had that flat response. when i look at different tf on winISD with my subs, even with a tf of 29 hz it gains almost 3 db at 32 hz. with a tf of 37 hz it gains 6 db at 41 hz. my whole mission with winISD was to get that flat response and no or low gain but it's telling me to get that, i have to tune as low as 24.96. i'm not trying to be a pain in the a#& but i want to build this enclosure and i told myself i was going to get 1 program and stick with it. i picked winISD, lol. now i don't know:confused:
     
  12. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    Because of the way we (people) hear things, we actually want a little gain. We don't hear low frequencies well, so we need a slight boost. Typically we want +3dB to +6dB. As long as we have a smooth curve the sound will be very good.

    Again I cannot see your graph well, but I like the middle graph the best. Also, your low frequency response tells me that your using a large box. What speaker are you using?

    WinISD is a very good program
     
  13. kcox669live

    kcox669live Full Member

    yep, the middle one is tuned at 29 hz. The box that winISD came up with is 3.477 cu. ft. for 2 10 inch alpine swr 1043d. That does seem like a lot of cubes to me. i'm not sure if that's net or gross though
     
  14. Ranger SVO

    Ranger SVO Full Member

    Ya, lets reduce the box size to 2.8 cu ft internal size, but no more than 3 cu ft and thats for 2 woofers. Alpine recommends a tuning of around 34 to 35 Hz, which should give us about 4 to 5dB of gain. Your f3, tuned to 35, should be around 27 to 28 Hz. Performance would be awesome. Your actual volume in the box, after taking into account port and speaker (estimating) displacement should be around 2.4 to 2.5 cu ft.

    In WINISD if you press Ctrl and D you will get the speaker spec editor and you can input your own specs

    This is what I would do, its very close to the Alpine Specs on their website

    Alpine SWR1043d.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2011
  15. kcox669live

    kcox669live Full Member

    ok, here's what i came up with. vb=2.4, tf=35hz, gain=3.69db@42.26hz, roll off=28.96hz, with a very nice looking curve, it's not as sharp as the curves i was getting. that was a quick run through but now that i know how to use winISD better i think i can tweek it a little more to get an even better curve. thank you so much for your time ranger, me and winISD are friends again. freakin awesome!